Ok, so we're shown the beneficiary signature: First-Middle : Last, beneficiary.
It is the signature that "creates money." Example, when we sign a mortgage, they turn around and sell it, making tons of "money" from that signature. However, it's not the beneficiary signature.
How can anyone "make money" from our signature, without including beneficiary? In turn, are there reasons why can we not use our signature, without beneficiary attached? What are the differences?
In that same thought, for a lot of things, companies are using digital signatures, in lieu of wet signatures, from basic banking to luxury items. If it couldn't be used for them to "make money from our signatures," I don't think they'd use it.
I'd like to hear others comments/answers.